This lack of coordination can lead to increased work of breathing, discomfort, and prolonged time on ventilation, which can subsequently lead to other complications.
Understanding the types and causes of ventilator dyssynchrony is crucial for healthcare providers to optimize patient-ventilator interaction and improve patient outcomes.
Take our free course to master the basics of mechanical ventilation with clear explanations and helpful practice questions.
What is Ventilator Dyssynchrony?
Ventilator dyssynchrony occurs when a patient’s natural breathing efforts are out of sync with the cycles of a mechanical ventilator. This mismatch can occur during any phase of the breathing cycle: inspiration, expiration, or between breaths.
When dyssynchrony happens, it can increase the patient’s work of breathing, cause discomfort, and lead to inadequate ventilation.
Adverse Effects
Patient-ventilator dyssynchrony can result in several adverse effects, including the following:
- Patient discomfort
- Increased work of breathing (WOB)
- Respiratory distress
- Increased anxiety
- Overdistension
- Ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI)
- Prolonged sedation
- Prolonged duration of mechanical ventilation
- Increased time in the ICU
Note: Each adverse effect caused by patient-ventilator dyssynchrony is associated with an increased mortality rate.
Causes
- Ineffective triggering
- Incorrect ventilator mode
- Incorrect ventilator settings
- Inappropriate triggering
- Flow dyssynchrony
- Exhalation dyssynchrony
- Auto-PEEP
- Artificial airway problems
- Drug-induced problems
- Certain lung diseases
Management
The management of ventilator dyssynchrony depends on the specific cause. Since inappropriate ventilator settings are typically involved, making proper adjustments appears to be the best treatment method.
For example, the practitioner may need to adjust the flow, sensitivity, or inspiratory time. A different ventilator mode may be considered as well.
In general, the less control the ventilator has on the patient’s respiratory pattern, the less likely they will experience dyssynchrony.
Volume-controlled ventilation typically results in more cases of dyssynchrony because it controls volume, flow, and time. Pressure support ventilation (PSV), on the other hand, typically results in the least amount of cases.
Proportional Assist Ventilation (PAV) and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) are two ventilator modes that are effective in avoiding dyssynchrony. That is because they allow the patient to select the ventilatory pattern that is delivered.
Ventilator Asynchrony vs. Dyssynchrony
Ventilator asynchrony and dyssynchrony both describe the same clinical phenomenon: a mismatch between a patient’s natural breathing efforts and the mechanical assistance provided by a ventilator.
This lack of coordination can lead to inefficient ventilation, increased work of breathing, and reduced patient comfort.
Whether referred to as “asynchrony” or “dyssynchrony,” the key concept is the importance of aligning the ventilator’s support with the patient’s natural respiratory rhythm.
Achieving this synchrony is crucial for optimizing clinical outcomes, improving patient comfort, and facilitating successful weaning from mechanical ventilation.
Take our free course to master the basics of mechanical ventilation with clear explanations and helpful practice questions.
Ventilator Dyssynchrony Practice Questions
1. Why is a patient-ventilator interaction not a problem during controlled ventilation?
Because the patient is not interacting with the ventilator. It is, however, a major issue during patient-triggered ventilation
2. What has poor patient-ventilator interaction been associated with?
It has been associated with an increased length of time on the ventilator, increased time in the ICU, the need for a tracheotomy, and increased mortality.
3. Issues with the artificial airway can cause what?
It can cause marked changes in the patient-ventilator interaction.
4. The development of a pneumothorax is a major cause of what?
It is a major cause of a markedly deteriorating patient-ventilator interaction.
5. Why is it unlikely that a mechanical ventilator malfunction is the cause of poor patient-ventilator interaction?
Because, with today’s mechanical ventilators, the technology is so advanced that this should never happen
6. The less control exerted by the mechanical ventilator on the patient’s ventilatory pattern, the less likely it is that the patient will develop what?
Patient-ventilator asynchrony
7. What are the general types of ventilator asynchrony?
Flow asynchrony, trigger asynchrony, cycle asynchrony, and mode asynchrony
8. Ventilator asynchrony can be caused by what?
It can be caused by an inappropriately set sensitivity, PEEP, flow, tidal volume, and inspiratory time.
9. Flow asynchrony is a result of what?
The flow provided by the ventilator being inadequate to match the patient’s inspiratory demand
10. Trigger asynchrony can manifest as what?
Missed triggering, delayed triggering, auto-triggering, double triggering, and reverse triggering
11. Missed triggering and delayed triggering are normally a result of what?
Auto-PEEP
12. Auto-triggering is normally a result of what?
It can result from circuit leaks or fluid moving back and forth in the ventilator circuit. It can also be caused by hyperdynamic contractions of the myocardium.
13. Flow asynchrony is a result of what?
It is a result of the ventilator providing less flow than the patient’s respiratory center requires.
14. When does mode asynchrony occur?
It occurs when the selected mode of ventilation does not match the patient’s ventilatory demands.
15. Why can volume ventilation be expected to cause the most asynchrony?
Because it controls volume, flow, and time.
16. Which mode of ventilation should result in the least asynchrony?
Pressure Support
17. Why do PAV and NAVA cause the least asynchrony?
Because they do not force a ventilatory pattern but follow the ventilatory pattern selected by the patient.
18. What causes trigger delay?
Auto-PEEP, poor sensitivity setting, and ventilatory malfunction.
19. How can a trigger delay be modified?
It can be modified by minimizing auto-PEEP, applying PEEP, decreasing minute volume, or setting an appropriate sensitivity.
20. What causes auto-triggering?
Circuit leaks, water in the circuit, inappropriately set sensitivity, and hyperdynamic cardiac contractions.
21. How can auto-triggering be modified?
New ventilator circuit, removal of water from the circuit, and appropriate sensitivity setting.
22. What are the four causes of poor patient-related interaction with a ventilator?
Abnormal respiratory drive, secretions in the airway, bronchospasm, and abdominal distension.
23. What are some adverse effects of a poor patient-ventilator interaction?
Unstable hemodynamics, ventilatory patterns, and gas exchange values.
24. What is the primary reason for poor patient-ventilator interaction?
A sudden change in clinical status.
25. What are the first four steps in the management of sudden respiratory distress in a ventilated patient?
(1) Remove the patient from ventilator, (2) Manually ventilate the patient with 100% oxygen, (3) Perform a rapid physical assessment, and (4) Check to be sure for a patent airway.
26. In what mode of ventilation is asynchrony most likely?
Volume-controlled Assist/Control
27. In volume-controlled ventilation, what three things can the ventilator control?
Volume, flow, and time.
28. In pressure-controlled ventilation, what two things can the ventilator control?
Pressure and time.
29. What mode of ventilation is flow asynchrony most likely?
Volume-controlled ventilation
30. How much flow does a patient with a strong ventilatory demand require?
60 L/min
Access our quiz, which includes sample TMC practice questions and detailed explanations to master the key concepts of mechanical ventilation.
31. What inspiratory time is usually appropriate to generate flow?
0.6 to 0.9 seconds
32. How can you improve flow asynchrony in pressure-controlled ventilation?
Adjust the rise time (0.4 seconds).
33. What is the primary contributor to trigger asynchrony?
Auto-PEEP
34. What are some techniques for minimizing the effects of Auto-PEEP?
Decrease the inspiratory time, bronchodilation, secretion management, and increase the artificial airway size.
35. What are the potential causes for a trigger delay?
Auto-PEEP, ventilator malfunction, and an inappropriate sensitivity setting.
36. What time length should the trigger delay attempt to stay under?
It should stay under 100 milliseconds.
37. What mode of ventilation is double triggering most common in?
Volume-controlled Assist/Control
38. What are the potential causes of double triggering?
The inspiratory time is too short, or the tidal volume is too low.
39. What are some potential causes of auto-triggering?
The presence of condensation or a leak in the tube.
40. In what mode of ventilation is cycle asynchrony more common?
Pressure-controlled ventilation
41. What mode of ventilation can be the most problematic because the respiratory center of the brain cannot distinguish between mechanical and spontaneous breaths?
SIMV/PS
42. How long can it take for a patient to recover from ventilator fatigue?
24 hours
43. How quick can ventilator atrophy occur?
48 hours
44. When more variables are controlled by a ventilator, what can occur?
There is a greater outcome for asynchrony.
45. When does flow asynchrony occur?
It is most common in volume-controlled ventilation but can occur in any mode.
46. What happens to the patient if the rise time is too slow?
The patient’s work of breathing will increase.
47. How can you prevent flow asynchrony in volume-controlled ventilation?
Increase the peak flow and decrease the inspiratory time, or change to a decelerating flow waveform
48. How can you prevent flow asynchrony in pressure-controlled ventilation?
Adjust the rise time
49. What is the biggest factor in trigger asynchrony?
The presence of auto-PEEP
50. Double triggering can cause what?
Barotrauma
51. What is cycle asynchrony?
It occurs when the ventilator ends the breath at a time different from when the patient wants to.
52. What is the most common form of cycle asynchrony?
An inappropriately short inspiratory time
53. In what mode of ventilation is asynchrony less likely to occur?
PAV or NAVA
54. What is the difference between ventilator dyssynchrony and asynchrony?
These two terms can be used interchangeably; therefore, there is no difference.
55. What is a patient-ventilator interaction?
A term that describes the connection and deliverance of a breath to a patient by the machine
FAQs About Ventilator Dyssynchrony
What is Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony?
Patient-ventilator asynchrony refers to the misalignment between a patient’s spontaneous breathing efforts and the mechanical support provided by the ventilator.
This discord can compromise patient comfort, gas exchange, and may lead to potential lung injury.
What is Auto-Triggering?
Auto-triggering occurs when the ventilator delivers a breath without a corresponding patient effort, usually due to factors like leaks, circuit condensation, or cardiogenic oscillations, rather than a genuine patient-initiated breath.
What are the Common Types of Ventilator Dyssynchrony?
Common types of ventilator dyssynchrony include flow asynchrony, trigger asynchrony, cycle asynchrony, and inspiratory effort vs. delivered volume mismatch.
Recognizing these specific types helps clinicians tailor ventilatory support more effectively.
What is the Role of Pressure Sensors in Combating Ventilator Dyssynchrony?
Pressure sensors in ventilators play a crucial role in detecting the patient’s breathing efforts.
By accurately sensing subtle changes in airway pressure associated with the start and end of a patient’s breath, these sensors allow the ventilator to align its support with the patient’s respiratory rhythm, thus minimizing dyssynchrony.
Final Thoughts
Effectively managing ventilator dyssynchrony is essential for ensuring patient comfort and optimizing clinical outcomes.
By identifying and addressing the causes of dyssynchrony, healthcare providers can enhance the synchrony between the patient and the ventilator, ultimately leading to improved patient experiences and reduced time on mechanical ventilation.
Written by:
John Landry is a registered respiratory therapist from Memphis, TN, and has a bachelor's degree in kinesiology. He enjoys using evidence-based research to help others breathe easier and live a healthier life.
References
- Faarc, Kacmarek Robert PhD Rrt, et al. Egan’s Fundamentals of Respiratory Care. 12th ed., Mosby, 2020.
- Chang, David. Clinical Application of Mechanical Ventilation. 4th ed., Cengage Learning, 2013.
- Rrt, Cairo J. PhD. Pilbeam’s Mechanical Ventilation: Physiological and Clinical Applications. 7th ed., Mosby, 2019.
- “Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony.” PubMed Central (PMC), 2018.